Supreme Court of Minnesota May 29, 1903, Nos. 13,529—(21) (State v. Bongard)

START, C. J.

Action upon a forfeited recognizance. The trial court, as a conclusion of law from the facts found, directed judgment against the defendants for the sum of $1,250. The defendant Mesenbring then made a motion for a new trial on the ground of errors of law occurring at the trial, accident and surprise, and that the decision *427is not justified by tbe evidence.