Oregon Supreme Court March 28, 1904 (Brett v. Warnick)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-03-1904
Mr. Justice Wolverton,
after stating the facts in the above terms, delivered the opinion of the court.
Two questions are presented: (1) Whether the complaint states a cause entitling plaintiffs to equitable relief, and (2) whether the agreement relied upon for recovery is subject to the objection that it is essentially a wagering contract, and therefore void, as in contravention of public policy.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit