Michigan Supreme Court November 21, 1905, Docket No. 31 (Auditor General v. Fleming)

Grant, J.

(after stating the facts). The contestant’s contention is:

1. That taxes rejected by the auditor general for ■erroneous or. indefinite description cannot be reassessed upon a different description than that contained in the original assessment roll.

2. That the taxes in this- case were assessed upon a different description of land than that contained in the original assessment.

3.