Supreme Court of Arkansas February 24, 1906 (Rugg v. Lemley)

McCulloch, J.,

(after stating the facts.) The facts of this case are practically undisputed.

There are two questions of law presented: (1) Whether the court had jurisdiction to hear and determine the cause of action against appellant Rugg for the recovery of half the cost of the wall;'and (2) which of the two claimants should recover the same, Mrs. Womack, the widow and legatee of J. P.