Missouri Court of Appeals May 22, 1906 (Sexton v. Snyder)

NORTON!, J.

(after stating the facts). — 1. The first and principal argument advanced for a reversal of the judgment is that the court erred in refusing to permit M'r. Snyder to become a party defendant in the *675circuit court and to file a counterclaim. It is only necessary to say in answer to this proposition that Mr. Snyder is no party to this suit and has no standing in this court.