Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory September 26, 1907 (Choctaw, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Sarlls)

Townsend, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The plaintiff in error has filed four assignments of error, as follows: “(1) Because the verdict is contrary to the evidence; (2) because the verdict is contrary to law; (3) because the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence; (4) because the court erred in not directing a verdict for the defendant, the appellant herein” — and says in his