Supreme Court of Oklahoma February 18, 1908, No. 1892, Okla. T. (Cockrell v. Schmitt)

Turner, J.

(after stating the facts as above). In her second amended petition, defendant in error, hereafter called “plaintiff,” included in the same cause of action the property in controversy of which she claimed to be owner, and the property in which she claimed special ownership by virtue of a certain chattel mortgage filed with her petition and marked “Exhibit A” and the first assignment of