Supreme Court of Georgia March 27, 1908 (Hutcherson v. Ladson)
Also known as
United States · · · 27-03-1908
Pish, O. J.
1. A party is not entitled to a continuance because one has been previously granted to his opponent and none has been granted to him.
2. Nor can a party have a case continued because of his own unexplained absence from the court, although he may be the main witness in his own behalf and his counsel may not be prepared to go to trial in his absence.
3.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit