Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 18, 1908, Appeal, No. 259 (Richards v. Walp)

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Fell,

The question raised by this appeal is whether the proofs presented at the trial were sufficient to rebut the presumption of payment arising from the lapse of time. The proceeding was on a mortgage to collect two installments of pur*414chase money of $933.33 each, one clue in 1876 and the other in 1877.