Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 18, 1908, Appeal, No. 125 (Commonwealth v. McKwayne)

Also known as

United States · · · 18-05-1908

Pee Curiam,

Two of the assignments of error, the second and the seventh, *452are not in compliance with rule 31, which requires that the testimony and the rulings of the court shall be set out in the assignment. But, because of the nature of the case, we have examined these assignments to see whether there was any •merit in them. We find none.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.