Wisconsin Supreme Court February 18, 1908 (Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.)

Also known as

United States · · · 18-02-1908

Mabshall, J.

Did the court err in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, due motion therefor having been made %

That is the first proposition submitted for consideration. In support thereof the following minor propositions are suggested :

1. There was not sufficient evidence to warrant the jury in finding that there was a hole in the mill floor as claimed.

2.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.