Wisconsin Supreme Court February 18, 1908 (Howard v. Beldenville Lumber Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 18-02-1908
Mabshall, J.
Did the court err in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant, due motion therefor having been made %
That is the first proposition submitted for consideration. In support thereof the following minor propositions are suggested :
1. There was not sufficient evidence to warrant the jury in finding that there was a hole in the mill floor as claimed.
2.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit