Cuyahoga Circuit Court May 18, 1908 (Corrigan v. Marshall)

Also known as

United States · · · 18-05-1908

WINCH, J.

The judgment in this case must be affirmed, for it does not appear either from the transcript of the docket of the justice of the peace or the bill of exceptions, that the plaintiff in error did not consent to the continuance of the case beyond the time limited by the statute within which a justice of the peace retains jurisdiction of action begun before him.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.