U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania December 9, 1908, No. 21 (Rathfon v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.)

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

After considering the plaintiff’s argument upon the motion for a new trial, I am still of opinion that the instructions given to the jury were correct and that the promissory notes referred to in the argument were clearly renewals of former obligations. No money passed at the time.