Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York March 5, 1909 (City of New Rochelle v. Cortright)
Also known as
United States · · · 05-03-1909
Gaynor, J.:
The assignment of the moneys due and to grow due to the contractor on the contract, to which the plaintiff consented, was not an alteration of the contract by the parties. On the contrary, the contract provided that that might be done.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit