Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court May 18, 1909 (Wylie v. Marinofsky)

Rugg, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover a horse. The plaintiff contended that she was the owner. The defendant contested this, and asserted that he bought the horse of the plaintiff’s husband, and paid him for it, and that the plaintiff either- authorized or ratified this sale. There was evidence in support of all these claims.