Indiana Court of Appeals February 18, 1909, No. 6,362 (Majenica Telephone Co. v. Rogers)
Also known as
United States · · · 18-02-1909
Myers, J.
It is suggested by counsel for the appellee that the appeal herein should be dismissed because the bond
1. for the appeal in terms did not contain the name of the surety in the body thereof, and was not signed by the appellant, the judgment defendant, but by the surety alone.
2.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit