District Court, D. Connecticut March 2, 1910 (In re Monarch Corp.)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-03-1910
PLATT, District Judge.
The petition will precede this memorandum.
Two objections are urged against it: Birst. Lack of jurisdiction over the stockholders who reside in other states. Second. Lack of power to grant the request for a specific assessment upon the capital stock, which is said to be in large part unpaid for.
The first objection is easily disposed of.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit