Supreme Court of Minnesota June 2, 1911, Nos. 17,003 — (110) (Patterson v. Adan)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-06-1911
Per Curiam.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident, and the trial court granted a new trial because of improper and prejudicial remarks of plaintiff’s attorney in his argument to the jury.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit