Hawaii Supreme Court January 22, 1913, NO. 22 (Wall v. Focke)
Also known as
United States · · · 22-01-1913
Per Curiam:
The opinion of the court upon the defendant’s exceptions to the trial court’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial concluded with the statement that “the exceptions are sustained and the order granting a new *407trial is set aside.” The plaintiff, conceding the correctness of the conclusion that the .
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit