Oregon Supreme Court July 1, 1913 (Johns v. City of Pendleton)
Also known as
United States · · · 01-07-1913
lead-opinion
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice McBride.
1. The principal, contention here urged is that the selection of a patented paving compound manufactured by a single company, and exclusively controlled by it, rendered it impossible for any but a single corporation to bid, and that it is therefore inimical to that provision of the city charter of Pendleton which requires all paving contracts to
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit