Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit May 5, 1913, No. 2,199 (Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. v. Alaska-Portland Packers' Ass'n)

GILBERT, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It is contended that the marine insurance, while it covered the same property and_ insured against the same risk as the policy issued by the plaintiff in error, is not “concurrent” insurance within the permission of the policy issued by the latter, for the reason that the liability is not the same; that while the liability on the fire