Court of Appeals of Georgia April 12, 1919, 10267 (Cason v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 12-04-1919
Broyles, P. J.
1. The defendant’s motion for a continuance of the
ease, based upon the absence of two witnesses, did not show that he expected to be able to have the testimony of the witnesses at the next term of court.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit