Superior Court of Pennsylvania February 28, 1919, Appeal, No. 108 (Schrœder v. Hallem)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-02-1919
Opinion by
Orlady, P. J.,
A judgment was regularly entered in the court below, which the defendant sought to have opened on a petition in which he stated at length his reasons. This was replied to by the defendant, who denied unequivocally the material facts, and on a hearing had before the court, the parties had full opportunity to explain orally their respective contentions.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit