Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court April 14, 1920 (Reaugh Construction Co. v. Corlett)

Kramef, J.

It is contended by counsel for defendants herein, in support of the defendant’s nmtion for a new trial:

First. That the jury erred in returning a verdict for plaintiff for the full contract price, when, at the most, substantial performance of the contract only, has been proved.

The claim that the evidence does not show strict performance is doubtlessly well taken.