Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York June 15, 1921 (Rosenzweig v. Dime Savings Bank)

The real ownership of this bank deposit and how far it was known to Mr. Rosenzweig seem doubtful, and we, therefore, afford the plaintiff a new trial. Hence the judgment and findings numbered 4, 5 and 6, are severally reversed, with the conclusion of law, as against the weight of the evidence, and a new trial is granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Blaekmar, P. J.