Supreme Court of Connecticut November 7, 1923 (Tierney v. Rotante)

Per Curiam.

There was a fair conflict in the evidence as to how the accident occurred.

The verdict of the jury imported that it found in accordance with the plaintiff’s claim, as it had the right to do, and the evidence was such that it might reasonably have found that the defendant was negligent and that the plaintiff was in the exercise of due care.

There is no error.