Superior Court of Pennsylvania April 25, 1923, Appeal, 86 (Waldman v. Baer)
Also known as
United States · · · 25-04-1923
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This appeal has two complaints: 1, that judgment was not stricken off for apparent irregularity; 2, that it was not opened to a defense on the merits.
1. The judgment was entered pursuant to a warrant in a lease. The lease provided that “......H. Waldman by H. Windt & Company herein called lessor, hereby leases to Joseph Baer......
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit