Court of Appeals of Georgia August 24, 1923, 14166 (Mitchell & Son v. LaFayette Investment & Realty Co.)

Also known as

United States · · · 24-08-1923

Stephens, J.

1. While a promise to perform that which under an existing contract the promisor is already bound to the promisee to perform, constitutes no consideration for a contract, yet where in forming the new contract it is the expressed intention of the parties to abrogate and mutually rescind the first contract, which is executory on both sides, the promise in the new agreement is a

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.