Superior Court of Pennsylvania October 13, 1924, Appeal, 82 (Flood v. Northeastern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n)

Per Curiam,

A verdict of $880 was rendered in the court below by a jury after a very careful presentation of the disputed facts. In disposing of the motion for a new trial, the trial judge reviewed the disputed facts and legal controversies, sustained the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entered a judgment for the defendant.