Supreme Court of Georgia February 16, 1924, No. 3555 (Carruth v. Ætna Life Insurance)

Husserl, 0. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) In considering the general demurrer the first question presented is whether *616this plaintiff can maintain the action, and the answer to this question must depend upon the relation of Ethel Harmon, the plaintiff’s decedent, to the contract. We will first review the nature of the contract. In brief, it is an agreement on the part of the .