Alabama Court of Appeals November 17, 1925, 4 Div. 136. (Clayton v. State)

lead-opinion

RICE, J.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny. There was ample evidence to support the verdict returned, and there was no error in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Perforce there was none in refusing to give the duly requested affirmative charge in his favor.