Supreme Court of Alabama January 15, 1925, 5 Div. 891. (Bartee v. Matthews)

SAXRE, J.

The bill in question is somewhat lacking in clearness of averment, but if, considering defects of form amended, it contains equity, it should be heard, however denominated. If, on the other hand, it contains no equity, it was properly taken from the files; the method being in that ease immaterial.