Supreme Court of Minnesota December 31, 1925, Nos. 24,794, 24,795. (Thiem v. Eckert)
Also known as
United States · · · 31-12-1925
Holt, J.
(dissenting.)
The action is not on the deed. The recovery rested not on oral testimony but on a written statement as to the amounts the parties to the. deed were to pay and receive.
Dikhll, J. (dissents.)
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit