Supreme Court of Minnesota February 20, 1925, No. 24,238. (Hinkle v. Minneapolis, Anoka & Cayuna Range Railway Co.)

lead-opinion

Wilson, C. J.

The record presents the abstract question, namely: Is wilful and wanton negligence by a plaintiff a defense to an action for plaintiff’s injuries caused by the wilful and wanton negligence of the defendant?

*113

The bill of exceptions does not contain the evidence. We must assume that the facts warranted the charge given.