Supreme Court of Minnesota December 11, 1925, No. 24,825. (Schendel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.)

Dibell, J.

(dissenting.)

I dissent from the conclusion that the evidence, viewed and weighed as the jury might view and weigh it, does not permit a re

*233

covery because of its failure to show a causal connection between tbe violation of tbe Safety Appliance Act and tbe death of tbe plaintiff’s intestate. I do not disagree with tbe general propositions of law stated in tbe opinion.