Supreme Court of New Jersey October 19, 1925 (Keegle v. County of Hudson)

Also known as

United States · · · 19-10-1925

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for tiie reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance

— The Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 12.

For reversal

— None.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.