Supreme Court of Pennsylvania March 18, 1925, Appeal, 30 (Epstein v. Ratkosky)

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffee,

This litigation is between father and daughter; the father is plaintiff, the daughter, defendant and appellant.

The essential facts out of which the case arises are these: The father purchased a store property; he paid $12,000 for it, $7,500 in cash and assumed two mortgages amounting to $4,500. The property represented substantially all his possessions.