Supreme Court of Pennsylvania March 19, 1925, Appeal, 39 (Franklin Savings & Trust Co. v. Clark)

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Defendant had endorsed a promissory note held by plaintiff and payable at its banking house. The maker was a depositor in the holder bank, having two accounts, one individual and the other “John W. Garland, Spe

*215

eial.” On the day of maturity of the note the individual account was slightly overdrawn; the “special” account had a balance of $102.39.