Supreme Court of Pennsylvania December 1, 1925, Appeal, 407 (First Nat'l Bank of N.J. v. Cattie Bros.)

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

In its statement of the question involved in this case, the only point plaintiff asks us to determine, is whether “a new trial [should] be granted if the jury unreasonably disregards the evidence and finds for the defendant.” In its assignment of error raising this question, it sets forth eight reasons why this should have been granted by the court below.