Court of Appeals of Georgia June 9, 1925, 16385 (Adams v. State)

Also known as

United States · · · 09-06-1925

ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.

Per Curiam.

It is well settled by repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court that an excerpt from a charge, wherein a complete proposition is stated, is not erroneous merely because it fails to embrace an instruction which would have been appropriate in connection with that proposition.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.