Court of Appeals of Georgia June 9, 1925, 16385 (Adams v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 09-06-1925
ON MOTION ROE REHEARING.
Per Curiam.
It is well settled by repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court that an excerpt from a charge, wherein a complete proposition is stated, is not erroneous merely because it fails to embrace an instruction which would have been appropriate in connection with that proposition.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit