Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit April 6, 1925, No. 345 (Cornelius v. C. C. Pictures, Inc.)

HOUGH, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). If Cornelius bad been -a stranger to the defendant corporation, as was Wener, no reason appears why our decision in Wener’s Case, supra, should not govern. But Cornelius was not a stranger. He was *309the president of the corporation and the active manage]' of its affairs.