Oregon Supreme Court December 23, 1926 (Citizens' Bank v. Knudson)

Also known as

United States · · · 23-12-1926

BEAN, J.

The defendant contends that plaintiff is not entitled to recover against him on the renewal

*497

note of February 26, 1923, for the reason that plaintiff is not a holder of said note in due course; that there was no consideration for the plaintiff signing said note; that plaintiff was fully advised before taking the renewal note that plaintiff claimed to have a good defense to the

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.