Court of Appeals of Texas March 11, 1926, No. 3194. [fn*] (Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hice)

LEVY, J.

(after stating the facts as above).

The propositions of appellant present, in effect, the points in view that: (1) The relationship of daughter-in-law and father-in-law is too remote to legally authorize a

*925

recovery for mental suffering for failure to attend the burial; (2) the addressee of the message was guilty of negligence proximately resulting in her suffering in failing to go