Alabama Court of Appeals June 30, 1928, 8 Div. 672. (Lyles v. State)

SAMFORD, J.

Without going into a detailed discussion of the evidence, we hold that the facts and legal inferences to be drawn therefrom are sufficient to sustain the conviction. The facts in this case are easily distinguishable from the facts in those cases cited by appellant in his brief.

Refused charge 4 is an argument, and refused charge 5 is not predicated upon all of the evidence.