Supreme Court of Pennsylvania March 15, 1928, Appeals, 76 and 77 (Stewart v. Pennsylvania R. R.)

Per Curiam,

The sole complaint here is that the court below abused its discretion by not granting a new trial on what defendant, appellant, claims to be the clear weight of the

*39

evidence in its favor. It is not necessary, and would serve no useful purpose, to state the facts or review the evidence.