Court of Appeals of Texas March 23, 1928, No. 409. (Erwin v. Curtis Et Üx.)

FUNDERBURK:, J.

Appellees W. J. Curtis and wife, as plaintiffs in the trial court, contended that a certain mineral deed, or royalty contract, dated February 12, 1918, and covering a tract of land alleged to be their homestead, was void because same was a forgery and because the notary taking the acknowledgments of plaintiffs to same was interested as a partner with the grantee.