Ohio Court of Appeals February 27, 1928, No. 3093 (Bauman v. Hanlon)

CUSHING, J.

The charge, as given, gave the jury the greatest latitude in determining the question of facts presented. When applied to the issues made by the pleadings in the case at bar, the charge was correct.

Counsel for plaintiff in error argues that the court should have charged on the custody and use of the caps.