Ohio Court of Appeals October 22, 1928, No. 9182 (Fusco v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.)

PER CURIAM.

Various assignments of error are set forth as grounds for reversal. The claim that the judgment is manifestly against the weight of the evidence is not, in our judgment, sustained by the record, because the record presents a conflict in the evidence, on the question of negligence of defendant, and we would not be authorized to disturb the verdict on that ground.