Ohio Court of Appeals October 29, 1928, No. 8729 (Soul v. Cleary)

HUGHES, PJ.

Under these circumstances, notwithstanding the sympathy which is elicited for Mrs. Cleary because of the losses occasioned by the unsuccessful business operations and other dis-sipations of the family funds by her husband, the law looks upon such a transaction as a fraud upon creditors, and hence the judgment must be for plaintiff, the costs to be paid out of funds derived from the