Supreme Court of Alabama June 6, 1929, 4 Div. 423. (Windham v. State)

*505

PER CURIAM.

If the following utterance in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, “The witness Tate, stating' that he did not know of the ‘raid’ of his own personal knowledge, could not, of course, testify that he saw appellant Windham at a named place on the day the ‘raid’ was made,” be construed as holding that personal knowledge on the part of the witness of the time and place of the raid,